| |
lIannis Xenakis
Iannis Xenakis in 1975.Iannis Xenakis (Γιάννης Ξενάκης) (May 29, 1922 -
February 4, 2001) was one of the most important Greek composers of the
20th century and major contributor to musical modernism, and an
architect .
Biography
Xenakis was born in Brăila, Romania to Clearchos Xenakis and Fotini
Pavlou, and studied architecture and engineering in Athens, Greece.
Xenakis participated in the Greek Resistance during World War II and in
the first phase of the Greek Civil War as a member of the students'
company Lord Byron of ELAS (Ethnikos Laikos Apeleftherotikos Stratos,
Greek People's Liberation Army). He received a severe face wound from a
shell which resulted in the loss of eyesight in one eye. In 1947 he fled
under a false passport to Paris. In the meantime, in Greece he was
sentenced, in absentia, to death. In Paris he worked with Le Corbusier.
While his assistant, Xenakis designed the Pavillon Philips in Brussels,
home of the première of Edgard Varèse's Poème Électronique at the 1958
Brussels International Fair. The Pavillon's hyperbolic structure was, in
fact, based on the formative structure of his musical masterwork "Metastaseis,"
composed some four years earlier. The dual nature of "Metastaseis" and
the Pavillon are an example of Xenakis' theory of meta-art – the concept
that an artistic expression can be realized mathematically in any
artistic medium. Xenakis performed at many world expositions and fairs,
and played annually in the Shiraz Art Festival in Iran.
Xenakis's primary teachers of composition were Arthur Honegger, Darius
Milhaud, and Olivier Messiaen. At the time he began composing in
earnest, Xenakis had not had much formal study of music and almost
nothing of theory, and so he studied harmony and counterpoint with
whoever was willing to accept him as a student despite his vast gaps in
knowledge and reluctance to defer to established authority. His own
early compositions, however, rarely followed the rules he was being
taught. His first meeting with Honegger exemplifies his attitude toward
formal instruction: asked to play one of his compositions on the piano,
Xenakis was stopped promptly as Honegger pointed out parallel fifths and
octaves. Xenakis had written them intentionally and refused to "correct"
the piece. Honegger attempted to humiliate Xenakis, who simply left to
study with Milhaud. However, he believed Milhaud's teaching also imposed
restrictions he found arbitrary and inessential.[verification needed]
Meanwhile, he continued to work full-time as an architect in Le
Corbusier's employ, composing only as a hobby. Xenakis was a creative
architect, exploring the possibilities of new materials and shapes in
construction, and was frequently entrusted with important projects that
called on his technical and artistic skills. Le Corbusier, who came from
a musical family (and pretended to hate music) also mentored Xenakis as
a composer; he regarded Xenakis and Varèse as two of France's most
innovative and promising.[verification needed]
Later, Xenakis approached Olivier Messiaen for compositional advice,
expecting to have to start his musical studies again from the beginning,
but was told "No, you are almost thirty, you have the good fortune of
being Greek, of being an architect and having studied special
mathematics. Take advantage of these things. Do them in your music."
Messiaen, whose own compositional style did not follow established
precedents, did not try to impose the limitations of baroque
counterpoint or serialism as previous teachers had, but rather let
Xenakis find his own musical ideas and guided them along. Xenakis
attended Messiaen's Paris Conservatoire classes regularly, and his
confidence grew along with his compositional skill; he would shortly
thereafter combine the mathematical ideas he had been developing in
Corbusier's studio with the musical tools he had been honing with
Messiaen to produce his first major work.
He is particularly remembered for his pioneering electronic and computer
music, and for the use of stochastic mathematical techniques in his
compositions, including probability (Maxwell-Boltzmann kinetic theory of
gases in Pithoprakta, aleatory distribution of points on a plane in
Diamorphoses, minimal constraints in Achorripsis, Gaussian distribution
in ST/10 and Atrèes, Markov chains in Analogiques), game theory (in Duel
and Stratégie), group theory (Nomos Alpha), and Boolean algebra (in
Herma and Eonta), Brownian motion (in N'Shima). In keeping with his use
of probabilistic theories, many of Xenakis's pieces are, in his own
words, "a form of composition which is not the object in itself, but an
idea in itself, that is to say, the beginnings of a family of
compositions." Unlike most of his contemporaries (i.e. Milton Babbitt,
Schoenberg), Xenakis did not want the listener to be aware of the forms
and theories used to produce his compositions.
In 1962 he published Musiques formelles, a collection of essays on his
musical ideas and composition techniques. This was later revised,
expanded and translated into Formalized Music: Thought and Mathematics
in Composition in 1971.
In 1966, Xenakis founded the Centre for Automatic and Mathematical Music
in Paris and subsequently set up a similar centre at Indiana University.
From 1975 to 1978 he was professor of music at Gresham College, London,
giving free public lectures.
He died in Paris in 2001.
In conversation, Iannis Xenakis frequently distanced himself from being
seen in too strict terms - like many other composers for whom method and
structure were the easiest aspects of music to discuss verbally, he sees
the role of such things as relative. One way to envisage this approach
is that the method constitutes a thematic germ, a starting-point, and
from there the normal musico-aesthetics, personal obsessions and
practical considerations play their normal role in finishing and shaping
the piece. Indeed from the 1970s onwards Xenakis' use of method became
deeply assimilated into his general musical thinking and he reports in
interviews from that time that the strict application of statistical
processes was no longer necessary to produce the results he was looking
for.
Xenakis appeared easily bored in interviews when people attempted to
take an overly simplistic view of him as 'complex' - the various clichés
surrounding him appeared to greatly annoy him in interview and he would
frequently make recourse to the wider aesthetics of music in general and
the other arts, in order to contextualise his contributions to
music-making. In a sense his early statements about "looking at music
statistically" were a response to what he saw as the mistake of placing
too much emphasis on the likely benefits of applying methodology too
rigorously.[verification needed] It is also important to note, however,
that this does not constitute any true dichotomy between Xenakis and his
peers - the application of single-minded rigour to composition in
post-war music was relative and momentary, and as with his own work, the
poetic and aesthetic significance of the gesture as a modern equivalent
to programme-music, as well as the vital role played by musicality and
music-editing/shaping has been widely undervalued in favour of
simplistic characterisations of such music as purely intellectual.
Overall then Xenakis' contribution to the modernist aesthetic arose from
the understanding that things which happen according to rules can be
changed without loss of overall meaning, and developed (immediately)
into a freeform polyphonic style focusing on large-scale emotional
control and a generalistic approach to melody.
Another glaringly obvious but often overlooked aspect of Xenakis' work
is the kind of neo-classical naming convention. Many essays have been
written about the formula titles of his numbered works but it seems very
clear that his obsession in most of his titles was with ancient Greece.
Selected works
Metastasis (Metastaseis B') (1953-1954), for orchestra of 61
instrumentalists
Pithoprakta (1955-1956), for orchestra of 50 instrumentalists
Achorripsis (1956-57), for 21 instrumentalists
Eonta (1963), for piano and 5 brass instruments
Oresteïa (1965-1966), on texts from Aeschylus, suite for children's
choir, mixed choir with musical accessories and ensemble of 12 musicians
Terretektorh (1965-1966), for 88 musicians dispersed among the audience
Medea (1967), scene music on texts from Seneca, for male choir playing
rhythms with cymbals and 5 musicians
Nomos Alpha (1966), for solo cello
Polytope de Montréal (1967), spectacle of light and sound for 4
identical orchestras of 15 musicians
Nuits (1967), on Sumerian, Assyrian, Achaean and other phonemes, for 12
mixed solo voices or mixed choir
Nomos Gamma (1967-1968), for 98 musicians dispersed among the audience
Anaktoria (1969), for ensemble of 8 musicians
Kraanerg (1968-1969), ballet music, for orchestra and four-channel tape
Persephassa (1969), for 6 percussionists
Persepolis (1971), for light and sound (eight-channel tape)
Cendrées (1973), for mixed choir of 72 (or 36) singers chanting phonemes
by Iannis Xenakis and 73 musicians
Evryali (1973), for piano solo
N'Shima (1975), on Hebrew words and phonemes, for 2 mezzo-sopranos (or
altos) and 5 musicians
Psappha (1976), for percussion solo (variable instrumentation)
Dmaathen (1976), for oboe and percussion
Kottos (1977), for solo cello
Jonchaies (1977), for orchestra of 109 musicians
Pléïades (1978), for 6 percussionists
Pour Maurice (1982), for baritone and piano
Shaar (1983), for large string orchestra
Keren (1986), for solo trombone
Jalons (1986), for ensemble of 15 musicians
Keqrops (1986), for solo piano and orchestra of 92 musicians
Kassandra (Oresteïa II) (1987), for amplified baritone (also playing a
20-string psaltery) and percussion
Rebonds (a + b) (1987-89), for percussion solo
La Déesse Athéna (Oresteïa III) (1992), for baritone solo and mixed
ensemble of 11 instruments |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|